THE FAMED AMERICAN novelist Ernest Hemingway once remarked that “There is nothing to writing. All you do is sit down at a typewriter and bleed.” He merely meant that when putting one’s words into ink, the writer should pour out his emotions, experiences, and innermost thoughts onto the page. He never said that it should be taken literally.
The Philippines has been ranked as one of the most dangerous places for journalists. The same is a grim reality that was illustrated by the recent brutal murder of Juan Jumalon, popularly known as DJ Johnny Walker. Jumalon was not merely a radio broadcaster—he served as a voice in his community, a trusted conduit for information, and a symbol of the essential role that journalists and broadcasters alike play in a healthy and functioning democracy.
His murder, caught on livestream as he went on air, is a painful reminder of the risks still faced by those who dare to speak truth to power. The brazenness of the attack, happening within the confines of his own home and workplace, echoes the broader threats faced by journalists in the Philippines. For many, it is an attack not just on an individual, but on the actual principles of a free press, a vibrant democracy, and the right of the public to be informed and to hold its principals to account.
The National Union of Journalists of the Philippines (NUJP) rightfully condemned this “brazen killing,” as it has done for many decades already. It highlights the chilling effect such incidents can have on media professionals who are already navigating a landscape filled with threats and intimidation, coming off the heels of the previous administration’s not-so-subtle attacks on the free press.
In the wake of this tragedy, the silence of the Marcos Jr. administration has been quite deafening. The President’s condemnation, while a necessary first step, is far from sufficient. The administration’s complete complacency and lack of initiative to address the broader issues affecting press freedom and all Filipino journalists’ safety speak volumes. Inaction in the face of such atrocities implies a tacit acceptance of the prevailing culture of impunity that was cultivated during the Marcos Sr. dictatorship and nurtured further by the Duterte administration.
And so Jumalon’s murder marks another dark chapter in the long history of violence against journalists in the Philippines. It is said to be the 199th case since 1986, a truly sobering figure that reflects the deeply entrenched challenges faced by the press in this country. The ranking of the Philippines as the eighth-worst country in terms of prosecuting the killers of journalists, which comes from the Committee to Protect Journalists’ 2023 Global Impunity Index, adds another damning layer to this already unsettling narrative.
For a country that was once considered to have “Asia’s freest press,” the steep decline in press freedom and the safety of journalists overall is a cause for grave concern for every Filipino. We all should acknowledge the fact that the press plays a vital role in holding those in power accountable, ensuring transparency, and fostering an informed public discourse. An attack on the press should always be seen as tantamount to an attack on the very foundations of our burgeoning democracy.
As the country’s fourth estate bleeds once more, journalists and citizens alike should demand action, accountability, and a commitment to the principles that underpin a thriving democracy. The administration of Marcos Jr. must not only condemn such heinous acts but actively work to address the root causes, strengthen legal protections for journalists, and ensure that those responsible are brought to justice.
In reflecting on this tragedy, we cannot ignore the haunting echoes of the murder of veteran broadcaster Percy Lapid just last year. Lapid, a veteran broadcaster known for his sharp commentary and critique of the Duterte administration, fell victim to a likewise gutless act. The recurrence of such heinous acts underscores a pattern of violence against journalists that demands urgent attention and resolute action from the authorities.
The Marcos Jr. administration’s response to these grave threats against journalists will be a litmus test for its commitment to upholding democratic values and ensuring the safety of those who contribute to the public discourse. As the ink of journalistic integrity continues to bleed, each drop should serve as a stark reminder that the pursuit of truth demands not just words but concrete actions to protect those who bravely wield the pen in the face of adversity. To write is to bleed, and the ink spilled in the pursuit of truth should never be in vain.

